6 - The second oerdimension
Now Ð1 is defined as first oerdimension and the true identity of the smallest possible circle is identified as the percx, its surface quantisized to be π. Ð1², the rotation of Ð1 discloses also the new unity of “dynamics”, no longer being related to whatever part of its curved D1- circumference nor by "that what it takes the sun to rotate around the Earth".
It was the "pendulum" of the versatile Dutch scientist Christian Huygens [1629-1685CE] which was patented in 1657CE resulting in a new level of precision in measuring "time".
Two years later Huygens presented his second formula, confirming how one full rotation of a single & lonely mass is indeed quantisized by squared seconds. And when the presence of the mysterious number pi  is no longer denied & darkmooned, the D2- surface of the circle discloses its unique & unambiguous relation with the oerdimension of dynamics:

Def.   Đ2  as oerdimension of dynamics defines “that what is needed for a rotating
          Đ1- radius to cover the surface of the “percx” as smallest possible part of a
          boundless, unlimited and infinite large D2- plane, its unity being a “period of thime”
          quantisized in squared seconds...                            

Although the verb “rotation” is inseparably related to dynamics, printed in italics, the upright printed Đ1 is still not un-ambiguous when is realized that the boundless, unlimited and infinite quantity of sizeless D0- point of nothing on this Đ1- radius are in motion, moving around their own circumference and the origin of the radius is not moving at all... So even when the appearance of pi restores and unifies the hitherto broken relation between π. Đ1² and Đ2  the ambiguity of the upright printed radius must be corrected...

But contrary to Huygens’ formula for a penduling mass which goes back and forth, his formula for a continuing rotating mass shows a same direction of rotation: once a direction of rotation is observed, the formula does not allow to change this, being in perfect opposition to the pendulum. Was the formula for the pendulum only valid for very small angles, a reversal of the full rotating mass would require a “braking force” which must be started by some dmu, reducing the tangential speed to \zero, accelerating the mass in opposite direction in order to arrive at the same tangential speed in opposite direction, being stopped in time by the same or some other dmu... 

This is similar to the irrevocable choice, made when P2 was chosen at one side of P1: there was is, and never will be a two-oneness in nature which would offer the possibility to arrive at the other negative side... An important indication, especially when the mathematical operation of “taking roots” does not exist in the process of creation, the true identity of a circle being not its first power and the second as unity of (classic) time but its true identity is its circular surface and the second power of Đ2 and its period of thime. This means that negative time does not exist in nature, just as negative distance doe not exist:

   once the “direction of rotation” has been chosen, it is irrevocable, it can’t be changed...

Anyway, Nature will provide further evidence, confirming why Ð2- thime can not run in opposite direction, even when the problem how to define & quantisize a direction in an objective way is still pending.

 

6.1 - The ambiguity of Đ1 discloses the new unity of volume
Now the oerdimension of dynamics Đ2 has been identified by its inseparable relation with the percx as smallest possible surface π. Đ1² based on oerdimension Đ1, this percx is an identity of the second power and that is not a volume of the third power. Hence there must be a lift in power with one unity which means a repeating multiplication in the third direction which must being independent of the directions of the X- axis and Y- axis in this plane, hence this third direction must be perpendicular to this D2- plane, 

But since the new start with nothing the only available terms are: oerdimension Đ1 as radius of the smallest possible circle ( 2 Đ1 being its diameter), its circumference having a curved Đ1- length of twopir: 2 π. Đ1¹ and the surface of the percx being π. Đ1².
So actually the only same base term is “onepir” π¹. Đ1¹ and when the static & immobile D0- origin or centre of the Đ1- radius is also going dynamic, moving in this third direction, its “translation” discloses the new two-oneness of a unified (translation + rotation)...This repeated multiplication in the third independent direction also
terminates the ambiguity of Đ1 as radius, now being fullydynamic, from now on printed in italics Đ1.

Def.    a repeating multiplication of the percx π. Đ1² as smallest possible unity of surface
           times twopir, 2 π. Đ1¹  shows how the base of each term is the same: π. Đ1. 
           This defines a cylinder, quantisizing its smallest possible unity of volume as
           π². Đ1³  but the inseparably relation between Đ1 and Đ2  also identifies this
           cylinder as dynamic volume per period of thime.

 

The peculiar similarity between Đ1 and Đ2...
Now the origin of radius Ð1 is also dynamic, translating along a straight D1- line, the distance over which this translation takes place is limited by the period of Ð2- thime, the other end of radius Ð1 rotating around the circumference of the circle, quantisized to have a curved length of twopir, 2 π Ð1 and only when the straight length is the same as the curved length: without ambiguity they are in accordance with the oerconditions.

The results of this third mathematical operation, being the repeating multiplication of
π. Đ1² times twopir 2 π Ð1¹= 2 π ² Ð1³ d efines & quantisizes the cylinder as new unity of volume, not only revealing a dynamic origin and a jump to the next, third power, but also enforces a jump in thinking: the static cube Ð1³ is no longer the unity of volume but the cylinder and its inseparable relation with Ð2 as oerdimension of dynamics.

Next figure shows the three jumps in power of Ð1 per same period of Ð2 as shown by the two jumps in power of pi.

This discloses a peculiar & characterising similarity between Đ1 and Đ2 as oerdimension of dynamics:

      just like no boundless, unlimited and infinite quantity of sizeless D0- points of nothing
      can ever be added “to fill the smallest possible Đ1- distance” or any longer
      D1- length, 
      No boundless, unlimited and infinite quantity of sizeless moments” of Đ2- thime 
      can ever add to one period...

When these discontinuous jumps are not realized and the concept of a boundless,
inlimited and infinite quantity is not properly understood, wrong conclusions as developed
since the19^th century can be no surprise either, as will be shown in Part II.

.

.

 

... but there is no unification
Now the initial ambiguity of the semi-static or semi-dynamic Ð1- radius is terminated by the translation of its origin, this also means that both motions (rotation + translation) must be completed within the same smallest possible period of Ð2- thime... But although this might define the (dynamic) cylinder, its volume is still empty, filled with no thing. Hence this would leave no thime to realize one cycle of the process of creation... The conclusion is simple: the translation from the N^th- cylinder to the next N+1- cylinder over the distance of twopir takes just a sizeless moment between the N^th- period of Đ2- thime and the next N+1^th- period, showing a discontinuous jump tol be detailed in Part II.

Another consequence will of the fact that “once the rotation is started, its direction can not be changed, it will go on for ever and ever”, presenting an “eternal discontinuous continuum”, each rotation being its own flat D2- plane, perpendicular to each Z- radial in the Universum.

After each new cycle, there is a jump over a distance of twopir in a sizeless moment of Ð2- thime, and this “eternal continuing discontinuum” discloses its perfect reversibility as deciding characteristic of absolute truth.
.
.